How a Secret Society Made Boilers Miserable

Behold a quaint slice of mid nineteenth century America where industrial steam behaved as if it had been insulted, and men answered with sabotage. In the anthracite coalfields of Pennsylvania a group known to history as the Molly Maguires were accused of attacking company property, interfering with pumps, and wrecking steam driven apparatus that kept mines dry and profits respectable. The result was terror, grief, and a legal circus the newspapers ate for breakfast.

The method was direct. Timber props and moorings were loosened. Machinery was smashed. Gaskets and fittings were covertly removed from steam systems so that engines would cough and stall. For owners this was an atrocious attack on commerce. For desperate workmen it was a statement delivered in greasy hands and awkward timing. Either way the boilers suffered and the local magistrates grew awfully exercised.

A worker repairs a large machine in warm tones of orange and blue, depicted in watercolor.

A Pinkerton agent called James McParland infiltrated the movement. His testimony led to trials in the 1870s which finished with convictions and executions. The law displayed a dashing appetite for order. The miners and their sympathisers showed a somewhat different appetite. I have seen both sides over the years. On the odd provincial stage I observed theatrical outrage, the kind that smells of coal dust and smoked tea. People were terribly proud and terribly afraid at once.

The whole affair read like a tragicomedy. Company boards insisted on splendid firmness. Local communities muttered codswallop about fairness. Men who had worked yonks underground were thrust into courts where delicate phrases of guilt were waved like handkerchiefs. The outcome left families bereft and an industry more suspicious than before.

There is a delicious irony in modern readers marvelling at the drama while sipping comfortable tea. The machines endured. The mines carried on. The human argument, beastly and stubborn, remained. If you prefer your history neatly wrapped, this example refuses. It proffers law and labour in the same unhappy parcel, and asks you to cope with the absurd reality that steam can be both servant and target.

Home